“You agree that a business or other entity may pay us to display your username, likeness, photos (along with any associated metadata), and/or actions you take, in connection with paid or sponsored content or promotions, without any compensation to you.” It’s such a blatantly clear, aggressive statement that it’s hard to imagine how Instagram expected anything but a backlash.
Kevin Systrome, Instagram’s co-founder and CEO, has already responded to the backlash with a blog post titled ‘Thank you and we’re listening‘. It’s PR gold…
“The language we proposed also raised question about whether your photos can be part of an advertisement. We do not have plans for anything like this and because of that we’re going to remove the language that raised the question.”
Kevin’s post is more of a clarification than a concession. Instagram won’t be removing the clause entirely, but will endeavour to amend the language to make it sound less asshole-ish.
The internet’s backlash is already in full swing. #boycottInstagram was trending on Twitter yesterday with thousands of users (Anonymous included) protesting with threats of deleting their accounts. Major blogs are asking if this is Instagram’s Netflix moment – A PR disaster causing millions of users to jump ship and stock prices to tumble.
We’ll wait and see how Instagram amends their terms. In the meantime, does this change the way you’ll use Instagram?
- Facebook and Photographers. Do you know your rights?November 15, 2012
- TIME Magazine’s Incredible Instagram Coverage of Hurricane SandyNovember 5, 2012
- Physical Instagram Camera in 2013August 30, 2012
- Photographers take back Instagram with ‘Instafocus’July 10, 2012
- Is Instagram spending its billion dollars on a camera?May 3, 2012